A Next.js delivery platform, built for launch
Our own pre-launch implementation: a Next.js app with a strict CSP, automated accessibility checks, and integrations designed to fail visibly when configuration is missing.
- Service
- devops-cloud
- Implementation status
- Built and ready for production deployment
- Reading time
- 2 min
This case study is about our own pre-launch implementation. It is not a live production deployment. Before we can publish signed client infrastructure work, the most honest thing we can show is the code and local production build behind this site. The details below are verifiable in the repository and with the documented build and test commands.
Why our own site counts as evidence
A DevOps claim is easy to make and hard to prove. So instead of describing a pipeline we ran for someone we cannot name, we document this implementation. The same discipline - security headers, a strict Content Security Policy, automated quality gates, and integrations that fail honestly instead of silently - is what we bring to client infrastructure.
Security posture
- Strict Content Security Policy with per-request nonces. Every inline script
on the site carries a nonce generated in middleware;
unsafe-evalis dropped entirely outside development. There is no blanketunsafe-inlineescape hatch. - Full security header set - HSTS, frame denial, referrer policy, and a locked-down permissions policy - applied at the edge, not per-page.
- No third-party script runs before consent. Analytics load only after the visitor accepts, and the CSP is written so a rogue injected script has nowhere to execute.
Quality gates that actually block
Before release, this implementation is checked with:
- TypeScript in strict mode - the whole codebase, no
anyescape hatches in the app surface. - Playwright end-to-end tests covering route status codes, navigation, form behavior, and layout overflow at mobile, tablet, and desktop viewports.
- Automated accessibility checks - axe-core runs against real rendered pages in the Playwright suite, not as an afterthought.
- A copy linter - a small custom script that fails the build on typographic and voice violations, because consistency is a delivery concern too.
Integrations that fail loudly, not silently
The forms are designed around external email delivery and spam protection. When a credential is missing, the affected feature says so plainly and tells the visitor how to reach us directly. Nothing is ever silently dropped. That fail-closed, fail-honest pattern is a deliberate engineering decision, and it is the same one we apply to client systems.
The stack
Next.js (App Router), React and TypeScript in strict mode, Tailwind CSS, middleware-based security and CSP, Playwright and axe-core for the test suite, and adapter-based integrations. The deployment target is Vercel; the required production credentials and deployment remain launch steps.
The honest caveat
This is our own platform, not a client engagement. It demonstrates the standard we are building toward, not a claim that the site or its integrations are live. When we publish client infrastructure case studies, they will name the client and the measured result.